International Conference of Technology, Innovation, Design & Enterprise (ICTIDE) Peer Review Process:
All submissions to ICTIDE are subject to a thorough peer-review process to ensure the quality and credibility of the published work. This conference follows a single-blind peer review system , in which the reviewers know the identity of the authors, but the authors do not know the reviewers' identities. The evaluation is conducted by experts in the relevant fields, who assess the submissions based on scientific rigor, originality, and alignment with the conference's scope
Ethics and Integrity Guidelines for the Peer Review Process
ICTIDE is dedicated in maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and ensuring the prevention of publication malpractice throughout its peer-review process. The conference follows these guiding principles:
1. Confidential Handling of Manuscripts:
The peer-review process is strictly confidential, and all information regarding submitted manuscripts is treated with the utmost discretion. Editors, reviewers, and all individuals involved are required to maintain confidentiality and must not disclose any details about the manuscript or the review process.
2. Objectivity and Impartiality:
Reviews are carried out in a fair and unbiased manner. Editors and reviewers assess manuscripts solely on their scientific merit, relevance, and quality, without influence from personal bias or conflicts of interest. They are expected to provide constructive feedback aimed at helping authors enhance their work.
3. Commitment to Timely Review:
ICTIDE is dedicated to ensuring a prompt review process. Editors and reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations within an appropriate timeframe, and authors will be kept informed of the status and progress of their manuscripts throughout the process.
4. Transparency and Accountability:
The peer-review process must be conducted with openness and responsibility. Reviewers are expected to provide feedback that is clear, well-justified, and constructive. Editors should base their decisions on both the reviewers' input and their own professional judgment, ensuring fairness and accuracy.
5. Declaration of Competing Interests:
Editors and reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could compromise their objectivity. If such conflicts arise, appropriate measures will be taken to guarantee an unbiased evaluation of the manuscript.
6. Addressing Plagiarism and Research Misconduct:
Editors and reviewers must remain alert to possible instances of plagiarism, data falsification, or other forms of research misconduct. Any suspected cases should be promptly reported to the appropriate authorities.
7. Acknowledgment of Reviewer Contributions:
ICTIDE values the essential role of peer reviewers, acknowledging their expertise and commitment. The conference will ensure reviewers receive proper recognition and credit for their significant contributions to the publication process.
ICTIDE is dedicated to preserving the integrity and credibility of its peer-review process. We are committed to ensuring fairness, transparency, and ethical practices in manuscript evaluation, thereby safeguarding the quality and reliability of the research we publish.
